23 Aug
2012
23 Aug
'12
2:11 p.m.
I'd prefer to see no language extensions at all, except by agreement among the sml community as a whole.
--lcp
On 23 Aug 2012, at 13:02, David Matthews David.Matthews@prolingua.co.uk wrote:
Over the years I've taken quite a strong line against extensions. The intention is that Poly/ML follows the Definition of Standard ML (Revised) i.e. ML97. That isn't to say that I couldn't be persuaded otherwise but I think it would require more than this.